Listening test for very low bit rate Ogg Vorbis encodings
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q 3 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 09.4s
Rate: 12.8233
Average bitrate: 73.9 kb/s
Ogg quality 0
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q 0 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 08.3s
Rate: 14.4509
Average bitrate: 48.3 kb/s
Ogg quality 0, resampled to 22050khz
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q 0 --resample 22050 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 05.1s
Rate: 23.4608
Average bitrate: 30.7 kb/s
Ogg quality 0, resampled to 11025khz
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q 0 --resample 11025 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 03.6s
Rate: 33.2143
Average bitrate: 20.6 kb/s
Ogg quality -1
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q -1 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 07.4s
Rate: 16.1914
Average bitrate: 37.1 kb/s
Ogg quality -1, resampled to 22050
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q -1 --resample 22050 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 05.1s
Rate: 23.3804
Average bitrate: 23.6 kb/s
Ogg quality -1, resampled to 11025
[lee@vorbis tmp]$ oggenc -q -1 --resample 11025 dn2004-0720-listening_test.wav
File length: 2m 00.0s
Elapsed time: 0m 03.5s
Rate: 34.0317
Average bitrate: 16.4 kb/s
My conslusions are that compared to the original, the -1 qualities sound
just as acceptable as the 0 qualities. Since we are shooting for nothing more than intellegibility here, I'd say that the lowest possible quality is recommended for targeting a modem audience in a live stream.
The quality 3 sounds exactly the same as the original to my ears, so I'd say that's a good setting for targeting a broadband audience.
| October 2008 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |